this annoys it because it generally tend to think of information such that each concept is a node and each relationship between concepts is an edge between those nodes on a two dimensional graph.
unfortunately, if it were to make a digital garden, it would probably write software to generate pages based on norg,$[make-footnote "natalie is only diagnosed with level 1 ASD and thus it does not have a build compliant with using emacs (requires ASD level 2+). also, neovim is already well integrated in to the way it does things."] which counts as an organizational tool.
making software that integrates with the way that this website already runs would be rather annoying due to the nest of complexity natalie has built up.
it supposes that it could have software similar to htmlgen that writes norg documents converted to html to natalieee.net/garden or something.
it could have even more symlinks floating around directories associated with this website, which would be kind of funny.
something like garden.natalieee.net would work, though then it must either retool its current webserver to be less horribly tied to this one specific project,$[make-footnote "thing it should do anyways"] or write an entirely different webserver.$[make-footnote "it starts college on monday, it should not do this"]
it is sure there are things that are more intelligent than it that have thought about such issues before, but it thinks it would probably be more interesting to create its own.
it supposes it could keep everything in a flat directory. this seems silly, however it doubts its future predicting abilities when it comes to what categories it should put things in.
