nat/webbed-site
1
0
Fork 3
Code Issues Pull Requests 1 Actions Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

initial

Browse Source
This commit is contained in:
gnat
2024-10-08 17:35:24 -07:00
parent 3ac80c39c8
commit 38437203d7
28 changed files with 154 additions and 155 deletions
Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

30
html/thoughts/meta
View File

@ -1,38 +1,38 @@
<!-- TITLE: metapost -->
<!-- DATE: 2024-09-20 04:22:41 -->
<h2>I am annoyed by this medium</h2>
<h2>it is annoyed by this medium</h2>
<hr>
this medium presents thoughts in a 1 dimensional manor without an ergonomic way to link between different posts.
this annoys me because I generally tend to think of information such that each concept is a node and each relationship between concepts is an edge between those nodes on a two dimensional graph.
this annoys it because it generally tend to think of information such that each concept is a node and each relationship between concepts is an edge between those nodes on a two dimensional graph.
the format of this webpage does not allow for such structure due to the linearity.
<hr>
perhaps a "digital garden" or similar system would be a better means of managing this page.
<hr>
<h3>issues with implementing a digital garden style approach to a webpage like this one</h3>
I am allergic to organizational tools.
unfortunately, if I were to make a digital garden, I would probably write software to generate pages based on norg,$[make-footnote "I am only diagnosed with level 1 ASD and thus do not have a build compliant with using emacs (requires ASD level 2+). also, neovim is already well integrated in to the things that I do."] which counts as an organizational tool.
natalie is allergic to organizational tools.
unfortunately, if it were to make a digital garden, it would probably write software to generate pages based on norg,$[make-footnote "natalie is only diagnosed with level 1 ASD and thus it does not have a build compliant with using emacs (requires ASD level 2+). also, neovim is already well integrated in to the way it does things."] which counts as an organizational tool.
<br>
why am I bad at organizational tools?
why is it bad at organizational tools?
<br>
I assume this is due to my marginally above average ability to remember information.
it assumes this is due to its marginally above average ability to remember information.
<br>
can this be mitigated by being very stuborn in my useage of such a tool?
can this be mitigated by being very stuborn in its useage of such a tool?
<br>
maybe.
<hr>
making software that integrates with the way that this website already runs would be rather annoying due to the nest of complexity I have built up.
I suppose that I could have software similar to htmlgen that writes norg documents converted to html to natalieee.net/garden or something.
I could have even more symlinks floating around directories associated with this website, which would be kind of funny.
making software that integrates with the way that this website already runs would be rather annoying due to the nest of complexity natalie has built up.
it supposes that it could have software similar to htmlgen that writes norg documents converted to html to natalieee.net/garden or something.
it could have even more symlinks floating around directories associated with this website, which would be kind of funny.
<hr>
another option would be to simply run a garden on a subdomain.
something like garden.natalieee.net would work, though then I must either retool my current webserver to be less horribly tied to this one specific project,$[make-footnote "thing I should do anyways"] or write an entirely different webserver.$[make-footnote "I start college on monday, I should not do this"]
something like garden.natalieee.net would work, though then it must either retool its current webserver to be less horribly tied to this one specific project,$[make-footnote "thing it should do anyways"] or write an entirely different webserver.$[make-footnote "it starts college on monday, it should not do this"]
<hr>
another issue with doing such a thing is figuring out a reasonable schema for nodes in the graph.
I am sure there are people who are more intelligent than me who have thought about such issues before, but I think it will probably be more interesting to create my own.
I suppose I could keep everything in a flat directory. this seems silly, however I doubt my future predicting abilities when it comes to what categories I should put things in.
it is sure there are people who are more intelligent than me who have thought about such issues before, but it thinks it would probably be more interesting to create its own.
it supposes it could keep everything in a flat directory. this seems silly, however it doubts its future predicting abilities when it comes to what categories it should put things in.
<hr>
implementing a digital garden seems as though it would probably demand redoing the whole website, actually.
I have already done that three to six times (depending on how one counts), and am not particularly keen on doing so again.
it has already done that three to six times (depending on how one counts), and is not particularly keen on doing so again.
<br><br>
oh well, I shall consider alternatives for the structure of this webpage.
oh well, it shall consider alternatives for the structure of this webpage.
$[put-footnotes]